<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MacWorld, and Apple, Doomed!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://apple.cansuckmyballs.com/2008/12/29/macworld-and-apple-doomed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://apple.cansuckmyballs.com/2008/12/29/macworld-and-apple-doomed/</link>
	<description>100% Pure Truth Juice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 20:29:42 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: conference tables</title>
		<link>http://apple.cansuckmyballs.com/2008/12/29/macworld-and-apple-doomed/comment-page-1/#comment-5705</link>
		<dc:creator>conference tables</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 20:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple.cansuckmyballs.com/2008/12/29/macworld-and-apple-doomed/#comment-5705</guid>
		<description>Thanks This was a wonderful piece of writing. Do give us more. I shall be eagerly anticipating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks This was a wonderful piece of writing. Do give us more. I shall be eagerly anticipating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: minisite designer</title>
		<link>http://apple.cansuckmyballs.com/2008/12/29/macworld-and-apple-doomed/comment-page-1/#comment-4305</link>
		<dc:creator>minisite designer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 00:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple.cansuckmyballs.com/2008/12/29/macworld-and-apple-doomed/#comment-4305</guid>
		<description>I am just making a blog related to this. If you allow, I would like to use some of your content. And with full refernce of course. Thanks in advance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am just making a blog related to this. If you allow, I would like to use some of your content. And with full refernce of course. Thanks in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amiee Benware</title>
		<link>http://apple.cansuckmyballs.com/2008/12/29/macworld-and-apple-doomed/comment-page-1/#comment-4151</link>
		<dc:creator>Amiee Benware</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 23:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple.cansuckmyballs.com/2008/12/29/macworld-and-apple-doomed/#comment-4151</guid>
		<description>This blog is excellent! Most of the time when i visit blogs, I run into terrible advertisements that give me nothing but this time I ran into your blog and I was surprised. You are giving out some awesome information. Please keep it up! If you want to make some money with your blog definitely check out it by&lt;a href=&quot;http://250c882l24ibq7e2s9jg2lmcpw.hop.clickbank.net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;clicking here!&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This blog is excellent! Most of the time when i visit blogs, I run into terrible advertisements that give me nothing but this time I ran into your blog and I was surprised. You are giving out some awesome information. Please keep it up! If you want to make some money with your blog definitely check out it by<a href="http://250c882l24ibq7e2s9jg2lmcpw.hop.clickbank.net/" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/250c882l24ibq7e2s9jg2lmcpw.hop.clickbank.net');">clicking here!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pasquale Chrismon</title>
		<link>http://apple.cansuckmyballs.com/2008/12/29/macworld-and-apple-doomed/comment-page-1/#comment-4039</link>
		<dc:creator>Pasquale Chrismon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 23:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple.cansuckmyballs.com/2008/12/29/macworld-and-apple-doomed/#comment-4039</guid>
		<description>Godaddy.com coupon code list. Several of the frequent Godaddy coupons are now invalid. Here are new coupons that are just announced. These promo codes will give you a discount at Godaddy. .COM Domain Names or Manual Renewals for just $7.49 - Use Godaddy.com coupons GOO3, OK9, or ZINE10. 25% discount on orders of $100+ - Use Godaddy coupon code OK25. 30% Discount when you buy any com domain - Use Godaddy coupon OK30. $12.99 SSL Certificates - Use Go Daddy coupons GOOSSL, OKSSL, or ZINESSL. Host Plan Promo Code - 20% Hosting Discount - Use Go Daddy coupon codes OK20H, ZINE20H1 or GOO20H. 10% off any size order - Use Godaddy coupon codes OK7, GOO1 or ZINE8. $5 Off $30 or More - Use Go Daddy coupon codes GOO2 or ZINE9. 20% Off Any order of $50 or more - Use Go Daddy promo code OK8.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Godaddy.com coupon code list. Several of the frequent Godaddy coupons are now invalid. Here are new coupons that are just announced. These promo codes will give you a discount at Godaddy. .COM Domain Names or Manual Renewals for just $7.49 &#8211; Use Godaddy.com coupons GOO3, OK9, or ZINE10. 25% discount on orders of $100+ &#8211; Use Godaddy coupon code OK25. 30% Discount when you buy any com domain &#8211; Use Godaddy coupon OK30. $12.99 SSL Certificates &#8211; Use Go Daddy coupons GOOSSL, OKSSL, or ZINESSL. Host Plan Promo Code &#8211; 20% Hosting Discount &#8211; Use Go Daddy coupon codes OK20H, ZINE20H1 or GOO20H. 10% off any size order &#8211; Use Godaddy coupon codes OK7, GOO1 or ZINE8. $5 Off $30 or More &#8211; Use Go Daddy coupon codes GOO2 or ZINE9. 20% Off Any order of $50 or more &#8211; Use Go Daddy promo code OK8.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://apple.cansuckmyballs.com/2008/12/29/macworld-and-apple-doomed/comment-page-1/#comment-2878</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple.cansuckmyballs.com/2008/12/29/macworld-and-apple-doomed/#comment-2878</guid>
		<description>I know you desperately want to see Apple fail. Perhaps someday they will, but right now they are growing ($34 Billion in the bank) and I think they are nowhere near a turning point.

I see no indication that Google is a threat to Apple.  It&#039;s way too early to judge whether Android will significantly impact iPhone sales. If anything, I&#039;d bet that  Android steals market share from the other smart phones.

Likewise, it&#039;s too early to project how forthcoming Chrome OS devices will fare against whatever Apple has up its sleeve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know you desperately want to see Apple fail. Perhaps someday they will, but right now they are growing ($34 Billion in the bank) and I think they are nowhere near a turning point.</p>
<p>I see no indication that Google is a threat to Apple.  It&#8217;s way too early to judge whether Android will significantly impact iPhone sales. If anything, I&#8217;d bet that  Android steals market share from the other smart phones.</p>
<p>Likewise, it&#8217;s too early to project how forthcoming Chrome OS devices will fare against whatever Apple has up its sleeve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://apple.cansuckmyballs.com/2008/12/29/macworld-and-apple-doomed/comment-page-1/#comment-2876</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 03:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple.cansuckmyballs.com/2008/12/29/macworld-and-apple-doomed/#comment-2876</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;“Apple will eventually cave in on itself, like all companies that are based on lies, filth, and the ass tonguing of the American media.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ah but Brett, the hegemonic mass that is Microsoft has far more resources and influence than Apple could ever dream of.  Apple will fall first as not microsoft, but companies like Google start to make them irrelevant.   Microsoft may take some hits, but they have too many irons in too many fires to fall completely by the wayside.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>“Apple will eventually cave in on itself, like all companies that are based on lies, filth, and the ass tonguing of the American media.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Ah but Brett, the hegemonic mass that is Microsoft has far more resources and influence than Apple could ever dream of.  Apple will fall first as not microsoft, but companies like Google start to make them irrelevant.   Microsoft may take some hits, but they have too many irons in too many fires to fall completely by the wayside.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://apple.cansuckmyballs.com/2008/12/29/macworld-and-apple-doomed/comment-page-1/#comment-2875</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 03:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple.cansuckmyballs.com/2008/12/29/macworld-and-apple-doomed/#comment-2875</guid>
		<description>@ BigHarryBalls 

&quot;Have you ever seen Windows 1.x? Not even close to the Mac UI! &quot;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Microsoft_Windows
http://inventors.about.com/od/mstartinventions/a/Windows.htm

Windows 1.0 was not allowed to look like the Mac until Microsoft eventually found leverage (it may have been threat of not renewing the license to AppleSoft Basic in the Apple II&#039;s ROM) to force Apple to cross-license certain aspects of the Mac UI.  Apple had zero access to Xerox code while Microsoft (as a Mac developer) had access to Apple&#039;s APIs.  Windows wound up looking a whole lot like the Mac (a hell of a lot more than the Mac resembled a Xerox Star).  It doesn&#039;t take a rocket scientist to deduce who copied whom.  If you have a reliable source contradicting this conclusion, please post it. Apple never claimed to invent the GUI.  They only perfected the first commercially successful GUI-- one that is still being copied to this day. 

&quot;Apple will eventually cave in on itself, like all companies that are based on lies, filth, and the ass tonguing of the American media.&quot;

Maybe so, but this will be one of the few areas in which Microsoft will be leading the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ BigHarryBalls </p>
<p>&#8220;Have you ever seen Windows 1.x? Not even close to the Mac UI! &#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Microsoft_Windows" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/en.wikipedia.org');">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Microsoft_Windows</a><br />
<a href="http://inventors.about.com/od/mstartinventions/a/Windows.htm" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/inventors.about.com');">http://inventors.about.com/od/mstartinventions/a/Windows.htm</a></p>
<p>Windows 1.0 was not allowed to look like the Mac until Microsoft eventually found leverage (it may have been threat of not renewing the license to AppleSoft Basic in the Apple II&#8217;s ROM) to force Apple to cross-license certain aspects of the Mac UI.  Apple had zero access to Xerox code while Microsoft (as a Mac developer) had access to Apple&#8217;s APIs.  Windows wound up looking a whole lot like the Mac (a hell of a lot more than the Mac resembled a Xerox Star).  It doesn&#8217;t take a rocket scientist to deduce who copied whom.  If you have a reliable source contradicting this conclusion, please post it. Apple never claimed to invent the GUI.  They only perfected the first commercially successful GUI&#8211; one that is still being copied to this day. </p>
<p>&#8220;Apple will eventually cave in on itself, like all companies that are based on lies, filth, and the ass tonguing of the American media.&#8221;</p>
<p>Maybe so, but this will be one of the few areas in which Microsoft will be leading the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://apple.cansuckmyballs.com/2008/12/29/macworld-and-apple-doomed/comment-page-1/#comment-2873</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 22:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple.cansuckmyballs.com/2008/12/29/macworld-and-apple-doomed/#comment-2873</guid>
		<description>BigHarryBalls,

I can not begin to thank you for bringing some sense of reason here.  Clearly, the Apple juggernaut must be stopped and hopefully people will start understanding that ITS JUST A FUCKING COMPUTER.  Not a goddamn fashion accessory.  One thing that always got me going was the comparison that &quot;Apple is like a BMW and a PC is like a Chevy&quot;.  Where the fuck, and who the fuck, thought up that hot stream of diarrhea.   Apple quality sucks shit.  The only thing they do have going is a nice OS, but they wont allow you to &#039;legally&#039; install it because if they actually gave people a choice, they&#039;d be fucked.

Apple will eventually cave in on itself, like all companies that are based on lies, filth, and the ass tonguing of the American media.  Until then, I implore all reading this post to stop by your local Apple Store, and set every browser&#039;s homepage to apple.cansuckmyballs.com!!  I actually did that once, and sat outside drinking a coffee (not from Starbucks either, that foul rank tasting liquid manure hawkers that they are) while I laughed my ass off.  

Now that&#039;s funny.  Almost as funny as seeing Verizon&#039;s new Droid cut into iPhone sales and it hasn&#039;t even been out a month.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BigHarryBalls,</p>
<p>I can not begin to thank you for bringing some sense of reason here.  Clearly, the Apple juggernaut must be stopped and hopefully people will start understanding that ITS JUST A FUCKING COMPUTER.  Not a goddamn fashion accessory.  One thing that always got me going was the comparison that &#8220;Apple is like a BMW and a PC is like a Chevy&#8221;.  Where the fuck, and who the fuck, thought up that hot stream of diarrhea.   Apple quality sucks shit.  The only thing they do have going is a nice OS, but they wont allow you to &#8216;legally&#8217; install it because if they actually gave people a choice, they&#8217;d be fucked.</p>
<p>Apple will eventually cave in on itself, like all companies that are based on lies, filth, and the ass tonguing of the American media.  Until then, I implore all reading this post to stop by your local Apple Store, and set every browser&#8217;s homepage to apple.cansuckmyballs.com!!  I actually did that once, and sat outside drinking a coffee (not from Starbucks either, that foul rank tasting liquid manure hawkers that they are) while I laughed my ass off.  </p>
<p>Now that&#8217;s funny.  Almost as funny as seeing Verizon&#8217;s new Droid cut into iPhone sales and it hasn&#8217;t even been out a month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigHarryBalls</title>
		<link>http://apple.cansuckmyballs.com/2008/12/29/macworld-and-apple-doomed/comment-page-1/#comment-2872</link>
		<dc:creator>BigHarryBalls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 22:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple.cansuckmyballs.com/2008/12/29/macworld-and-apple-doomed/#comment-2872</guid>
		<description>And BTW, sighting blogs and folklore sites as &quot;fact&quot; about the GUI&#039;s history re: Apple, Microsoft, and Xerox just proves how far you will go to try and spin your bullshit into some assemblance of truth to which you base your pitiful alegence to you god, Apple. Apple and Microsoft both ripped of Xerox. I used to use a Xerox Star workstation at Xerox in Rochester and know first hand how both Microsoft and Apple implemented design ideas from Xerox&#039;s implementation. But to say that Microsoft Windows is the result of a reverse engineering effort is just more sour grapes from an Apple fanboi appologist. Have you ever seen Windows 1.x? Not even close to the Mac UI! You can spin it all you want but at the end of the day common sense rules the day and your &quot;facts&quot; are just a bunch of fanboi nonsense. Remember it&#039;s just a computer, stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And BTW, sighting blogs and folklore sites as &#8220;fact&#8221; about the GUI&#8217;s history re: Apple, Microsoft, and Xerox just proves how far you will go to try and spin your bullshit into some assemblance of truth to which you base your pitiful alegence to you god, Apple. Apple and Microsoft both ripped of Xerox. I used to use a Xerox Star workstation at Xerox in Rochester and know first hand how both Microsoft and Apple implemented design ideas from Xerox&#8217;s implementation. But to say that Microsoft Windows is the result of a reverse engineering effort is just more sour grapes from an Apple fanboi appologist. Have you ever seen Windows 1.x? Not even close to the Mac UI! You can spin it all you want but at the end of the day common sense rules the day and your &#8220;facts&#8221; are just a bunch of fanboi nonsense. Remember it&#8217;s just a computer, stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigHarryBalls</title>
		<link>http://apple.cansuckmyballs.com/2008/12/29/macworld-and-apple-doomed/comment-page-1/#comment-2871</link>
		<dc:creator>BigHarryBalls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 22:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple.cansuckmyballs.com/2008/12/29/macworld-and-apple-doomed/#comment-2871</guid>
		<description>Thanks for making my point Brett. Elitist to the end... BTW, love the lastest quality reports on Apple displays... iFlicker; nice feature. Made in China (just like everything else)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for making my point Brett. Elitist to the end&#8230; BTW, love the lastest quality reports on Apple displays&#8230; iFlicker; nice feature. Made in China (just like everything else)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
